Twitter declined to remark. Palihapitiya, Sacks, Calacanis, Jurvetson, and Rabois didn’t instantly reply to requests for remark. Musk and two of his attorneys didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.
Elon Musk countersues Twitter forward of recent October trial date
A flood of doc requests issued over the weekend and into Monday marks the most recent twist within the contentious and fast-evolving courtroom case between the social media service and Musk, who’s attempting to drag out of his bid to take over the corporate.
After Musk stated he was exiting the deal final month — accusing Twitter of not being forthright in regards to the quantity of spam and bots on its service — Twitter sued Musk in a Delaware enterprise courtroom, referred to as a Chancery Courtroom. Musk in flip countersued Twitter on Friday. Twitter additionally issued subpoenas over the weekend to a bunch of banks concerned within the deal, together with Credit score Suisse and Morgan Stanley.
The subpoena obtained by The Submit contains intensive requests for communications, together with “checklists, timelines, presentations, decks, organizational calls, meetings, notes, recordings” associated to the deal‘s financing. Twitter lists individuals who previously had not been named as having involvement.
Twitter schedules shareholder vote for embattled Elon Musk deal
Calacanis and Andreesen were previously known to be involved in financing aspects of the deal.
The Monday subpoena obtained by The Post also specifically asks for any communications about spam and bots, as well as for information about the All-In Summit 2022, a Miami event held in May by Palihapitiya, Calacanis, Sacks & David Friedberg. The men host a popular podcast together and the summit was a live event associated with the podcast. Musk spoke at the event via videoconference.
At the event, Musk telegraphed his apprehension about the deal, saying “the more questions I ask, the more my concerns grow.”
Musk had tweeted days earlier that the deal was “on hold” because of concerns about the proportion of spam or fake accounts on the site. He said at the conference that he could seek a lower price for the social media site and accused Twitter of potentially misleading him about the percentage of fake accounts on the platform, likening the issue to buying a house with a termite problem.
Calacanis and Sacks are known to be friends of Musk. Sacks worked with Musk when the men ran PayPal, along with billionaire Peter Thiel, who is a friend of both men. Rabois also was a PayPal executive, and a friend of Thiel. Jurvetson is a longtime friend of Musk who is on the board of Musk’s SpaceX and served on the board of electrical automotive firm Tesla, which Musk helms as CEO.
A subpoena additionally went out to investor Joe Lonsdale, an affiliate of Musk and Thiel who additionally spoke on the All-In occasion, in response to a tweet by Lonsdale on Monday. Lonsdale declined to remark past his tweet.
Elon Musk traces up rising checklist of buyers to take over Twitter
Within the tweet, Lonsdale described the subpoena as a “giant harassing fishing expedition,” and he stated he had “nothing to do with this aside from a few snarky comments.”
Lonsdale, Rabois, Sacks, and Thiel are additionally identified to lean proper politically, they usually function in a conservative political orbit that Musk has gotten more and more concerned in, beforehand reported by The Submit.
Calacanis launched a pool referred to as a particular objective automobile to lift cash for the deal this spring, utilizing a software that brings smaller buyers into a bigger bid. It aimed to draw buyers at a minimal of $250,000. Buyers had been informed to point out their curiosity no later than Might 11. Calacanis hosted Musk on the All-In Summit just a few days later.